Rhetorical analysis of how to tame

Alzaldua is known for bringing art and spirituality to her work as she tries to gain awareness of social justice issues in the United States Linda Napikoski, about. Everything and everyone is institutionalized nowadays, whether it is from your relatives or your instructors at school, you are almost always taught to believe and think a certain type of way.

The rhetorical situation Anzaldua is focusing on in her writing is the struggle of bilingual Latin Americans and their discourse community. Gloria Anzaldua was born in in south Texas Annenberg Learning.

I took all criticism constructively growth mindsetand tried to apply the knowledge of others into my own work. Gloria fully believes everyone of minority decent is expected to be submissive. Everyone is constantly scrutinizing her!

Andrew Thomas Coleman

How can she win? Anzaldua is trying to use her first hand experiences to try and get her audience to accept their true cultural heritage and own and embrace it.

One of her sub-arguments is people need to Rhetorical analysis of how to tame their identities and use their identities as strengths in order to prove all the doubters wrong.

To make her argument she relies on a logical structure filled with examples and observations designed for people to connect and feel her first hand experiences as struggling as a bilingual female suffering from cultural identity issues, issues such as being looked down upon for being a minority and ridicule for speaking her native tongue, designed to create sympathy and compassion amongst her listeners.

She tells us that Chicano Spanish is considered by Latinos to be a disgrace. Anzaldua vividly feels it is inadequate for her to take these speech classes; it is only fair that she is able to express and have great pride in her cultural heritage.

Although I am not fluent in the Spanish language, I could picture and imagine what she was going through by her vivid imagery and diction of her first hand experiences. Annenberg Foundationn.

What I liked most about the piece of writing I completed for my Major Project One was how I was able to adapt a new type of writing Rhetorical Analysisand create a fully functioning academic paper.

She is writing to try and motivate others to not be discouraged about where they come from and that they should embrace the fact they are different and accept the challenge of being a bilingual citizen in the United States.

Minorities faced loads of racism, especially in the deep south where Gloria was raised, and if you were not an American Caucasian, you were simply looked down upon and immediately devalued. The funny part about that is Gloria is probably worth way more than that dentist ever was or ever will be.

She is reaching out to anyone who suffers from contrasting identities and she wants these people to embrace these flaws and use their identities as strengths in order to prove all the doubters wrong. Repeated attacks on our native tongue diminish our sense of self.

What the audience took from that specific quote is that Chicanos cannot be accepted among society and cannot create their own true identity. Gloria tells us about another experience when she is expected to be submissive and it happened early on in her academic career.

Anzaldua is also fixed on that women, especially minority women, were heavily disregarded. On Google maps I did some navigating and she practically lived right on the border of Texas and Mexico.

She used her first hand experience to demonstrate how she was heavily looked down upon for speaking her native bilingual tongue. This piece of writing gave me the opportunity to reflect on a personal experience of mine when someone tried to influence my personal identity.

But Gloria grew up in the forties and fifties in the heart of the south Texaswhere racism was more prevalent than in most parts of the United States. How to Tame a Wild Tongue.

The audience can conclude that her argument is valid because Americans that suffer from their identity of being Chicano can directly relate to her. She is writing this piece as a successful minority author who once was in the basement of society because of the color of her skin and where her ancestors once came from.

My writing process was a lot different than what I was accustomed to doing during my high school career. This was the first time I actually sat down with a faculty member and course assistant and fully broke down and analyzed my writing.

My audience for this assignment is not only Shelley, Alex, and my classmates, but also everyone who suffers from cultural identity issues. Works Cited Annenberg Learner. She goes on to tell her audience that all derogatory words and terms were only directly applied to woman. Gloria Anzaldua tells readers in her argument that you are expected to be submissive, expected to follow the norms in your society, and expected to follow others rules, even if you may disagree.

In my analysis I am arguing that Anzaldua feels that Latin Americans are forced to abandon their heritage and be submissive to white society. Anzaldua is talking to anyone who deals with contrasting identities. Submissiveness, which means willing to follow orders easily or visually passive, seems to be instilled at a very young age to children.

It becomes quite apparent to her audience that Gloria is pissed off when she makes a point in the article saying how white customs and laws will rot because of the patience and strength of the Spanish.Rhetorical analysis is a form of criticism (or close reading) that employs the principles of rhetoric to examine the interactions between a text, an author, and an audience.

Also called rhetorical criticism or pragmatic criticism. What in the world is a rhetorical analysis? To begin, let us define what a rhetorical analysis is NOT. A rhetorical analysis is not a summary the rhetorical strategies you are about to discuss. This will help identify the argument you are making, transition your ideas, and add fluidity.

4. Keep in mind that while authors use different. Being proud of one’s culture and language is often times lost when immigrating to a new country. Although criticized and attacked for her culture, Gloria Anzaldua describes in “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” that she refuses to let others force her to reject her culture for the sake of belonging and informs Americans and Latinos attempting to suppress.

Rhetorical Analysis Of How To Tame A Wild Tongue “My Perspective of a Wild Tongue” “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”, by Gloria Anzaldua, is a very expressive story about a Mexican American women’s struggle to preserve her culture.

Her main fight revolves around a struggle to keep a form of Spanish, called “Chicano Spanish”, a live. A rhetorical analysis is an essay that breaks a work of non-fiction into parts and then explains how the parts work together to create a certain effect—whether to persuade, entertain or inform.

Not Quite a Clean Sweep: Rhetorical Strategies in Grose’s “Cleaning: The Final Feminist Frontier” A woman’s work is never done: many American women grow up with this Analysis explains how quote supports thesis Quote illustrates how the author uses appeal to ethos Last sentence returns to the hook in the introduction.

Rhetorical analysis of how to tame
Rated 4/5 based on 4 review